<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; FlightAware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/category/flightaware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Getting more accurate flight tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/08/getting-more-accurate-flight-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/08/getting-more-accurate-flight-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ashley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FlightAware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upgradetravelbetter.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Consumerist featured a letter from a person frustrated by US Airways&#8217; website. It wasn&#8217;t the booking engine or the new site layout that got her juices going: It was the flight status page: I hit the US Air website. It said that the flight had taken off 3 minutes before it was scheduled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Consumerist <a href="http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/unknown/us-airways-flight-723-unknown-199005.php" target="_blank" class="liexternal">featured</a> a letter from a person frustrated by US Airways&#8217; website.  It wasn&#8217;t the booking engine or the new site layout that got her juices going: It was the flight status page:</p>
<blockquote><p>I hit the US Air website. It said that the flight had taken off 3 minutes before it was scheduled to and had landed exactly on time, although the status was &#8220;UNKNOWN&#8221;. For the next hour that &#8220;UNKNOWN&#8221; label, as I refreshed and refreshed, worried me more and more. I&#8217;m picturing all sorts of horrible things. Still no call from husband. I start planning my life as a single mother, when finally at 3:20PM, I got a call from him, saying he was finally on the ground. I asked how that could be since he&#8217;d taken off on time. He told me that the plane did not leave on time, and that it was about 11AM before they took off.</p></blockquote>
<p>While most seasoned travelers would say the letter-writer overreacted, even in the current culture of fear, the author probably had some reason to be scared.  After all, when airlines experience &#8220;incidents&#8221; they often remove the flight from the airport monitors and online status pages.  But of course programming errors happen, and thankfully the &#8220;unknown&#8221; flight was just delayed.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/759/2251/1600/unknown.jpg" target="_blank" class="liimagelink"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/759/2251/320/unknown.jpg" title="unknown " alt="unknown Getting more accurate flight tracking" /></a></center><br />
What should the upset letter writer have done?  How do you cross check this information?  Outsource.</p>
<p>Never just rely on the airline&#8217;s own website for flight status.  Instead, check out <a href="http://www.flightaware.com/" target="_blank" class="liexternal">FlightAware</a>, the site devoted to tracking all flights in American airspace.  You&#8217;ll see the actual time of takeoff, landing, a neat map of the flight route, and some dorky data on speed, altitude, etc.</p>
<p>But most importantly, FlightAware reports two different pieces of information than most airline websites: Wheels-up and wheels-down times.  Airlines categorize flights by the times the plane is out, up, down, and in.  &#8220;Out&#8221; and &#8220;in&#8221; refer to the departure and arrival <strong>at the gate</strong>.  &#8220;Up&#8221; and &#8220;down&#8221; refer to the takeoff and landing on the runway.</p>
<p>Instead of fretting about the &#8220;missing&#8221; flight on the US Airways site, the reader could have seen that the plane was delayed, but airborne.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/759/2251/1600/flightaware.jpg" target="_Blank" class="liimagelink"><img border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/759/2251/320/flightaware.jpg" title="flightaware " alt="flightaware Getting more accurate flight tracking" /></a></center><br />
If I&#8217;m picking someone up at the airport, I always check both the airline&#8217;s status page, and then check FlightAware to see how far out the plane really is.</p>
<p>Extra bonus: With FlightAware, you can even track private jets, charters, and UPS or FedEx flights &#8212; though I&#8217;m not sure you really need to track your shipment that way&#8230;  (It&#8217;s probably especially handy for private jets.)</p>
<p>Creating a free login on the site also lets you automatically refresh the live map of the actual flight route. You also get access to historical wheels up/down times, (not just the gate departure/arrival times) if you want to see how much time the flight actually spends in the air.  The maps are fun &#8212; hours of dorky procrastinatory fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/08/getting-more-accurate-flight-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

