First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!

Starbucks recently changed their wi-fi provider from T-Mobile to AT&T, and a different pricing scheme is in place. But why pay, when you can get it for free?

Frequent Starbucks wi-fi user Dr. Vino sends in this tip from WiFi Net News:

AT&T says in their press release that all Starbucks Card holders, which is simply their value-storing swipe card system [edit: would it have been too hard to call it a gift card?], will get two hours of free Wi-Fi a day. No purchase is needed: you just need an active card, I confirmed with the company. Walk in, buy a $5 value card, activate it, and you’re on for two hours a day from then forward. You can also use multiple devices with a single account, within reason, Starbucks told me.

So it’s not free, since you have to drop $5 on a Starbucks card, but you can tap the value AND get free wi-fi. Until there’s free universal wi-max, it’s worth considering.

(image)

It’s not Halloween, it’s ‘Take Your Columnist To Work Day’!
The New York Times’ Joe Sharkey, apparently tired of writing about business travel for his business travel column, pays a visit to someone’s place of business instead. But it’s no ordinary cubiclefest, but the wacky offices of Vegas.com. Joe’s money quote that makes the whole article worthwhile, though, is this: “Once, for a newspaper story in Philadelphia, I went to the animal shelter to bail out a stripper’s boa constrictor that was part of her act (the job of the snake, who adored her, was to untie her bikini top on stage).” Baby, that’s journalism.

It’s not Earth Day, either
Environmentalists in the UK aren’t cutting KLM any slack. The airline is introducing coffee grown on “sustainable” plantations, but the announcement was greeted with scoffs. Since airlines pump carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, a few acres of shade-grown coffee apparently don’t matter. Okay… but the airlines aren’t going to stop burning jet fuel overnight, and they have a choice TODAY regarding shade-grown vs. clear-cut-the-rainforests coffee. Give KLM a little credit.

Tehran is lovely this time of year
Iran is looking to attract tourists, and what better way to get them than to offer cash incentives? Iranian travel agents get a $20 bounty for every Western tourist they attract. Maybe they should start a rewards program for the visitors, though…

Air New Zealand goes ’round the world
Last week, Air New Zealand started flying from Hong Kong to London, making it the only airline to fly around the globe. (United gave up its Washington-London-Delhi-Hong Kong-Los Angeles-Washington circle in 2001, the previous holdout of single-airline RTW travel.) You can fly the loop for £801 (US$1521) including taxes for flights starting in London with stops along the way in Hong Kong, Auckland, and Los Angeles — cheap for a trip around the earth.

The life and times of (lost) luggage
Jane Engle follows the path of checked luggage. It’s a long but interesting tale, with some of the bags ending up at the Unclaimed Baggage Center in Alabama. Her suggestions at the end for making your bags identifiable are good ones, classics of travel advice. One variation on her suggestions, which I keep meaning to employ in practice, but somehow keep neglecting, is to print out your itinerary and put it inside the checked bag. That way, if the tracking tag falls off, it’s presumably easier to reunite you with your luggage.

Better food on Continental
Continental Airlines announced revisions to its menus, featuring recipes concocted by the airline’s “Congress of Chefs.” Call me a skeptic, but a stable of celebrity chefs doesn’t necessarily make the food taste any better at 39,000 feet. It still tends to taste like airline food… But change is good, and I’m all for trying out new recipes, so good on ‘em!

With its Hampton Inn brand now a late entrant in the Bed Wars, Hilton has opened a new front in the global lodging wars: Coffee.

Hilton rooms will soon feature Cuisinart dual-cup single-brew coffeemakers, stocked with Lavazza coffee (Grand Filtro roast, for those keeping score). Sounds better than the single-use packets of Superior Coffee, a company that seems to have the corner on the in-room coffee business.

Begun, the Coffee Wars have.

Who will escalate? I demand in-room espresso! Or the option of a “triple Venti, no fat, no foam, extra hot, with pink sugar” like Katherine Harris orders.

But seriously, better coffee is a nice touch.

Nonetheless, I’m still hoping for a lodging chain to take up my saber-rattling calls for Door Wars.

tags: travel | Hilton | coffee

James Wysong decries the state of inflight coffee and offers a number of theories that might explain why the coffee is subpar.

Coffee onboard is certainly better today than it used to be. But with name brands on board, like Starbucks on United, Seattle’s Best on Alaska, or local favorite Alterra on Midwest, expectations go up as well. It’s true, though, that coffee is still generally not as good in the air as on the ground. Plus, unless you’re riding up front on certain international flights, you can’t order a cappuccino in the air.

Wysong has five theories to explain the bad state of brew, but the five explanations really fall into three categories:

- The disgruntled flight attendant

Flight attendants want to make their jobs easier, so they brew bad coffee so no one will ask for a second cup, or they brew nothing but decaf to keep passengers sedate.

- The coffee roasters’ conspiracy

The coffee supplier sells crappy coffee to the airline to boost sales at airport vendors.

- The flawed brewing process

The process for brewing coffee on planes stinks, because the water isn’t hot enough, or the water from the “galley springs” tastes bad.

To be honest, if I had not read that the author of the piece was an airline flight attendant, I would have dismissed some of those hypotheses out of hand as a bit tin-foil-hat. (All airline coffee is decaf!!?! I’m skeptical…)

What I’ve found is that coffee varies by flight, not just by airline. The Starbucks coffee on United might be a watery swill one flight, and a reasonably robust brew on another.

If the caffeine on board isn’t all you wanted it to be, and you’re not as amped on the flight as you hoped, then perhaps a nap is in order. Can’t sleep on the plane? Maybe you’ll get lucky and arrive at an airport with a napping center. Vancouver is one such airport where you catch some quick z’s, with pods by Metronaps onsite. Hopefully located near a coffee shop.

tags: travel | air travel | coffee | naps | airports