Pet peeves revisited: Chip-and-PIN credit card “security” undermined
First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!
Remember the difficulties which blog readers (and I) shared regarding the use of American credit cards overseas, when the only way to complete a transaction was using “chip-and-PIN” technology?
The argument for the chip-and-PIN technology has always been enhanced security. Signatures were too easily faked (or ignored), the argument goes, and protection of having an embedded chip containing the card data, plus a numeric PIN, overrode the inconvenience caused to those (often international) customers whose cards didn’t have the requisite chip.
Chip-and-PIN terminals were supposedly tamper-proof, and the multiple-layers of security allegedly decreased risk to both the customer and the retailer.
Until now.
Researchers at the University of Cambridge have hacked a chip-and-PIN box, and in a demonstration of the machine’s weakness, reprogrammed it to play Tetris. A less jesterlike hacker might hack a box and use the terminal to capture card numbers and PINs. So much for a better mousetrap. See here. Be sure to scroll down to watch the video.
Think this new evidence will cause European credit card issuers to make it easier to use a non-chip card when making purchases? Don’t bank on it.
Related:
- Update: How to beat the chip and PIN credit card requirement?
- Rotten in Denmark: Credit cards with mandatory PIN
- “We prefer Visa cards†— just not yours
(via boingboing)







Subscribe to Posts by Email