First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!

The state of New Mexico has ordered US Airways to stop serving alcohol on board its airplanes.

The ruling applies only when the airline is in New Mexican airspace, and the flight is en route to or from an airport in the state. After a fatal drunk driving accident involving a passenger who tied one on in flight, New Mexican officials determined that US Airways wasn’t licensed to serve alcohol, and was effectively “bootlegging.”

Wow. Apparently, this is legit. Other airlines operating in New Mexico actually have a liquor license. Who knew?

Frankly, I’m not a lawyer, but I would have assumed that airlines were serving alcohol legally as part of some interstate commerce provision. But I guess they need a liquor license in every state (and city?) in which they operate.

(image)

A few weeks ago, I expressed dissatisfaction at the seemingly arbitrary restriction placed on duty free liquor purchases at Munich Airport. (On October 13, the duty free shop refused to sell me a liter of anything, saying that it wasn’t permitted for flights to the United States.)

I wrote an e-mail to the Munich Airport, asking why this was the case, considering that there was no German or European law that I could find requiring such strict limitations, and since the TSA’s published rule only required duty free purchases to be made “after security,” which this was. (Although, as is common for U.S.-bound flights, there was another redundant — and mind-bogglingly slow — security check at the entrance to the gate area.)

This past Friday, a representative of the Bavarian State Ministry of Commerce, Infrastructure, Transportation, and Technology responded. In German. (I had written to them in English, with the notation that I intended to publish their reply on this blog.)

Luckily I can read German… so here is my translation of the relevant bits:

At the time of your inquiry, only the TSA placed any restrictions on duty-free goods, including the “delivery at gate” procedure. Implementation of such a process was not possible for the shop’s managers. A separate duty free shop solely for the United Airlines and US Airways gates does not exist at the airport.

Since then, the EU-wide regulations governing the transportation of liquids and the purchase of duty-free goods have taken effect. With the implementation of these rules, duty-free goods may once again be purchased.

Click here for the complete reply in the original German (pdf).

I’m sorry, but this still doesn’t explain the intra-European variation between airports. If the TSA’s rules were so clear, then the procedures should have been standard. Other airports were not requiring delivery of liquids to the gate. This sounds like buck-passing by local airport officials or state bureaucrats.

Thankfully, at the end of the day, the standardization of rules across the EU means that such incidents may be less frequent. And you’ve got it in writing, Munich allows duty free purchases for flights to the U.S. That’s good.

But the EU guidelines remain a minimum requirement. Any airport, and any airline, can impose stricter rules regarding carry-on bags. Here’s hoping they don’t.

(image)

Most travelers on U.S.-based airlines have become resigned to the $5 cocktail on international routes, especially across the Atlantic. But as the Wall Street Journal notes, European carriers are starting to phase out free drinks at 35,000 feet as well.

SAS is offering one free alcoholic beverage on its long-haul flights, while Aer Lingus has already added a charge for all its booze.

More and more, I think you’ll find the one-free-drink rule, a la SAS and Delta, will be the norm for transatlantic travel. (Transpacific, the liquor is still flowin’!)

Related:
- The return of the comp inflight cocktail

(image)

Last week, returning to the United States, I connected via Munich. It’s a great airport in many respects, much nicer than its rival Frankfurt. Heck, it has its own brewery, AirBräu.

But Munich is a maddening place for one reason: Local airport authorities appear to be making up their own double-secret security policies regarding flights to the United States.

In particular: They’ve created a stricter liquids ban than European or American airport security rules demand.

As in many European airports, flights to the United States get especially zealous security, with extra bonus checkpoints, gates set apart from other flights, and a game of 20 questions before boarding. (New question for me this time was “Are you carrying any electronic items, and when did you last use them?”)

But Munich goes a step further, making things illegal that aren’t illegal elsewhere. Travelers on my flight grumbled that their stick deodorant had been taken away, despite being an opaque solid. But even worse, the perennial bugbear of liquids:

The ban on liquids purchased in the secure area of the airport has already been reversed, making it possible to buy duty free liquor or a bottle of water after security. But not in Munich, if you’re flying to the United States.

When the duty free shop denied my effort to buy a liter of hooch, they told me it’s because of American rules. But that’s not true. It’s not the European rule, either. No details at all on the Munich Airport website. Either the revised rules aren’t trickling down to Bavaria, or, much like in Britain, airport operators are making up the rules as they go along.

I suspect the latter. Consider yourself warned if traveling through Munich.

Related:
- Cavalcade of security news: Fingerprints, liquids, and suspicious looking devices
- Making sense of the new TSA liquids policy
- Liquid ban relaxed in the United States

(image)

Flying internationally into Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport? Bringing in some duty free liquor? Taking a cab? Better hide the hooch, and hide it well.

A number of Somalian cabbies in the area, citing their religious beliefs, have been refusing to transport passengers who are carrying or are even suspected of carrying liquor. It’s become pervasive enough that the city is considering a system for marking cabs that are anti-booze.

Driving a taxi means transporting all kinds of people, most of whom probably have some habits that you find repulsive in some way or another. Where do you draw the line? Perhaps “cab driver” isn’t the best career choice for these particular Minnesotans.

The free drinks are back, baby!

Well, sort of. Economy class travelers on Delta’s international flights will be able to have ONE complimentary alcoholic beverage with their meal, including their suggestively-named “Mile High Mojito,” starting Saturday, July 1.

Most US-based carriers have put a $5 price tag on booze in economy, while European and Asian carriers have still let the liquor flow. It seems that Delta will give you one free drink, but will charge you for any extra. Nonetheless, it’s nice to see any amenities restored to coach travel.

The airline will also reintroduce amenity kits with eyeshades, earplugs, etc., and printed menus to the economy cabin. (Couldn’t the menu simply be a business card that reads “chicken or pasta”?)

(image)
tags: travel | air travel | free drinks | Delta Air Lines Inc

Westin Hotels are going 100% nonsmoking. Minibars are disappearing from rooms. Now Kempinski Hotels of Germany, backed by the Paris-based Guidance Financial Group, are rolling out a new, halal, 100% alcohol-free chain, called Shaza Hotels.

Aimed at the Muslim traveler, the shariah-compliant chain will be based in Dubai, but it plans to open 20 hotels in urban centers in the Middle East and Southeast Asia.

The lack of booze won’t necessarily be part of the advertisements, though:

the Islamic and Arab angle is being downplayed in the marketing pitch; the promotional literature that expresses, in a contemporary design-led environment, the aesthetic art of living and values of the Middle East and North Africa. Each property will contain unique concepts such as ‘hammam influenced spas and bathrooms and restaurants inspired by an array of regional cuisine’.

Sounds swanky. If successful, the concept might spread elsewhere, too. Just probably not in Cancun.

(image: greybeard)
tags: travel | hotels | halal | sharia | Kempinski | Shaza