Archive for the 'Alamo Rent a Car' Category

Why you need to shop around for rental cars

First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!

orbitz-display.JPG

To see how the travel business really works, sometimes it takes a good old-fashioned lawsuit. Vanguard Car Rental, the parent company of Alamo and National, took Orbitz to court, because Orbitz wasn’t listing the Vanguard brands on the first page of search results when customers ran searches on the online travel megasite.

The suit, filed Friday in the Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County, alleges Alamo and National rental offers show up on a secondary page because Vanguard refused to increase the commission rate paid Orbitz for online bookings. That rate was established in a contract that runs through 2008.
[…]
Chicago-based Orbitz called the claims “baseless” in a news release, and said Vanguard was trying to sue its way to preferential placement on the website.

In addition to requesting the higher commission rate, Orbitz demanded $1.5 million in mid-April, Vanguard claimed.

Baseless? Orbitz panned the suit in a press release, but in the process, effectively admitted to doing what Vanguard accused them of, and exposed the nature of their business model: pay to play.

The bottom line is that Vanguard is trying to use a lawsuit to get a sorting result from Orbitz that Vanguard and Orbitz did not agree to. In short, Vanguard is trying to use its lawsuit to get something for nothing.

So the sorting of rental car prices isn’t based on price. Other sites are up front about this, by labeling the first set of results as “preferred vendors” or such. But Orbitz doesn’t do that. They just show results. And those results are driven by — let’s be blunt here — bribes.

So why did the judge throw out the case? After all Orbitz essentially agreed with Vanguard and admitted that they rank results according to who’s willing to pay for the privilege. But all this is seemingly legit, according to the contracts between the agency and the supplier.

At the end of the day, this illustrates that you really need to shop around. Never, EVER use just one site to search for fares or rates. You never know what secret deals are influencing the search results.

(Thanks to Budget Travel’s Sean O’Neill!)

Reader mail: What happened to car rental late-return grace periods?

clock.jpg

Two readers wrote in regarding late returns and grace periods when renting a car. Reader Francine writes:

When I rented a car from National recently, there was no grace period for late returns. None! Is this the latest way they get you?

And reader Peter offers this story, and advice, from his recent rental with Budget Rent-a-Car in Montreal:

I was late getting out of Vermont and late getting the car back to the airport. When I arrived I discovered that I had signed a contract that stipulated $33.xx CAD/hour for being late on a $55/day rental. Further, since I was 2hrs 15 minutes late they claimed I was 3 hours late (the grace period disappeared) and they charged me for another DAY, stating it would cost me less than 3 hours of the late charge.

I haven’t had any luck getting Budget to discuss this with me. If you rent from anyone be clear at pickup 1) what constitutes late and 2) what it costs when you are.

Indeed, grace periods are no longer a given when it comes to late returns. Hertz cut their grace period in half a year ago, and others soon followed suit. Nowadays, you really need to know what you’re signing (and initialing).

In Peter’s case, I see only one possible “violation” here on the part of the company: The forfeit of the grace period. But even then, if he returned the car two hours late (instead of three), he’s better off paying a full day extra, rather than two hours’ overtime. It sucks, but those are the terms.

With contracts like this, if you signed for it, you’re on the hook. These hourly rates are one of the items you’re often asked to initial.

Not all companies are the same, though: Late-return policies vary by chain, with some chains offering no grace periods whatsoever.

Perhaps even more importantly, some companies reserve the right to retroactively change your rate to a higher level — for the duration of the entire rental — if you return the car late. If anything, Peter was lucky they didn’t change his rate for the earlier days as well!

The policies of each major U.S. chain, with key points highlighted, after the jump:
(more…)

Short hops — April 3, 2007 — Scratch-and-Sniff, security comedy, and inflight wi-fi

scent-doctor.jpg

Your newspaper smells delicious, did you stay at an Omni?
Hotels’ “scent programs” and aromatherapy trends may have just jumped the shark. In a cross-promotional marketers’ fantasy come true, Omni Hotels have started slapping berry-scented stickers advertising Starbucks muffins on copies of USA Today. And the Wall Street Journal is considering adding scents to their advertising pages. Hopefully these odors won’t interfere with the whiff of lemongrass and green tea that’s being pumped into lobby spaces at the chain. What’s next, pay-per-view Smellovision?

Predict the next threat? A TSA-inspired contest
Bruce Schneier is running a contest to conceive of an absurd, fictional terrorist plot that would cause the TSA to start banning yet another product from airports. The more ludicrous the product, yet oddly plausible the threat, the better. Why? “The purpose of this contest is absurd humor, but I hope it also makes a point. Terrorism is a real threat, but we’re not any safer through security measures that require us to correctly guess what the terrorists are going to do next.” Partially-digested food, tooth-fillings, and zippers are front-runners in my book.

Enterprise Rent-a-Car buys Alamo and National
Enterprise is buying Vanguard Car Rental, the parent company of Alamo and National. The combined company would have over a million cars on its lots. Will rentals at Enterprise become more automated, like at Alamo/National? Will Alamo/National start doing the long walkarounds, hard-sells on CDWs, and secretly-negotiable rates?

Wi-fly
After the shutdown of Boeing’s Connexion satellite-based inflight internet service, other companies have been slow to start up service, which was promised nearly a year ago. Scott McCartney checks in with possible providers, and we’re still not there. But it’s coming “early next year.” And rest assured, Skype calls won’t go through. They’ll be blocked, so your fears of cellphone conversations can be kept at bay. Onboard wi-fi — which is already approved for service by both the FCC and FAA — will cost around $10 per day, and packages that link with existing services like T-Mobile HotSpot, Boingo, and iPass will be available. No word on which airlines will be the first to bite.

(image)

Alamo and National speed up rental car checkout

alamokiosk1.jpgThe self check-in kiosk is already taken for granted by most airline passengers, and increasingly, for better or worse, by hotel guests. Car rental companies have been slow to adopt self-serve machines, though. (In part, this likely has to do with the distribution of keys, though you get around this by simply putting the keys in the ignition in the secured parking lot. Anyway…)

Alamo and National (both belong to the same company, Vanguard) are introducing kiosks nationally, after successful testing in Las Vegas, Dallas, and Jacksonville.

I’m all for it. I can say “no” to collision damage waiver, etc., as quickly and easily to a person as I could to a machine.

While some companies, like Hertz and Alamo, make it easy for their frequent renters to get in and out quickly, the “masses” are generally stuck waiting in line. I remember waiting for over an hour — at midnight! — at the Budget desk at LAX. Awful. I would have gladly used a kiosk.

Perhaps this will improve the companies’ ratings for customer satisfaction. As Chris Elliott points out, the industry essentially gets a grade of “C.” Maybe the kiosks can bump it up to a B-.

Car rental companies find new and innovative ways to screw good drivers

Drive too little? That’s a fee. Live in the Bronx? Enjoy your surcharge. Bring the car back undamaged? More and more, that may be a fee too.

Car renters beware: You may be charged for vehicle damage that you didn’t cause, or that doesn’t exist. It may not be a matter of official policy, but it’s your word against theirs.

Laurie Berger reports that more and more travelers are finding repair charges on their credit card bills — often weeks or months after they’ve returned the car. The article focuses on rentals in Europe, though I’m sure the problem isn’t confined to there.

Particularly galling is the accusation that some rental agencies offer bonuses to their employees who charge customers for vehicle damage. (The accused, National/Alamo parent company Vanguard Car Rental, denies that such bonuses exist.)

Most of Berger’s advice is sound, though the takeaway is overly alarmist: “Rent at your own risk.” Come on. Are we supposed to cower in fear of the almighty power of Hertz? How about some more practical suggestions?

To avoid charges, customers should SLOWLY inspect the car before returning it, should have a rental representative sign off on the car’s condition upon return, and should bring a camera and — wow — a magnifying lens with them to document matters. A magnifying lens!?! (You don’t pack light, do you, Laurie?…)

One big omission, and perhaps the easiest solution of all: The article skips any reference to the insurance coverage benefit that many credit cards provide. For example, when renting abroad, most gold, platinum, or Signature Visa cards will provide primary collision and loss coverage, so if the rental agency says you scratched a bumper, it’s the credit card’s problem, not yours. If your card doesn’t have such a benefit, call your credit card issuer (or the competition) and get a card that does.

The credit card coverage offers enormous peace of mind. That doesn’t mean you should drive like a maniac (then again, you ARE covered…). You should still be diligent about checking the car for scratches and dents, before and after the rental. Even if the credit card issuer is on the hook for the bill, you’d still have the hassle of dealing with the charge to your account, the phone calls to customer service, etc. And besides, if it really IS a fraudulent charge on your card, then the rental company shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it.

(heather)
tags: | | |

About | Contact | RSS Feed / Subscribe
Support this Site | Policies | Greatest Hits
In the News