The PBS investigative series “Frontline” used the one year anniversary of the February 2009 crash of a Colgan Air Q400 (flying under Continental colors) as a springboard for an hour on the issue of regional airlines, their safety, and their relationships with their affiliated airlines and the FAA.

Much of it isn’t news to travel geeks, but for many, the report will be a revelation. It’s a disturbing report, and well worth watching.

The biggest takeaways:

  • Fatigue
    Many regional airline pilots aren’t paid very well, which leads them to live wherever it’s cheap (i.e., with their parents). But that isn’t necessarily close to their base of operations. This means long commutes, sometimes across the entire continent. So there’s a link between low pay and fatigue.
  • Risk-Taking
    The airline operating the regional jets and turboprops — and a pilot up front — typically gets paid only when the flight actually arrives at its intended destination. Diversions to another airport? No paycheck. That can encourage risk-taking.
  • Coziness
    The FAA, it’s argued, is too closely wed to the idea of “promoting” aviation, rather than regulating it. The airlines and their regulators are too close.
  • Obfuscation
    The mainlines try to sell subcontracted flights as if they’re their own, by putting the “Operated by…” in the fine print. Consumers who aren’t obsessive about travel aren’t necessarily aware that they’re technically flying a codeshare on another airline.
  • Inconsistency
    The regional airline industry has the gall to say, with a straight face, that their inflight services are on par with their mainline partners, for a “seamless” experience. Puh-leeze. When I don’t have to gate-check a regular-size carry-on when boarding a Canadair Regional Jet, then we’ll be closer to parity.

Personally, I’ve always avoided regional airlines when possible, preferring to fly on mainline planes, primarily because of comfort and convenience issues, rather than safety concerns. Wherever possible, I choose the larger plane, because they’re typically quieter, less cramped, less smelly (some of those CRJs smell just awful), and less likely to be delayed or canceled. (If air traffic control has to control the flow of aircraft into an airport, they’re more likely to bump a CRJ than a Boeing, if only because of the number of people served.) And that’s not even taking upgrade opportunities into account…

Watch the video below. It’s nearly an hour in its entirety.

(If you’re reading this via the feed, or can’t view the video above, click here to (re)load the post or head to the PBS site.)

pixel Damning PBS report on the safety of regional airlines and the coziness of the FAA with airlines
Categorized in: airlines, regulation

4 Responses to “Damning PBS report on the safety of regional airlines and the coziness of the FAA with airlines”

  1. === popurls.com === popular today Says:

    === popurls.com === popular today…

    yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…

  2. Oliver Says:

    Hmmm, no comments? Admittedly, I am late to this post myself (it’s been a to-do item in my feed reader for while and hopefully I’ll find the time to watch the full video tonight, so I’ll hold back with my own commentary).

  3. Mark Ashley Says:

    Oliver, I’m honestly surprised that this didn’t generate discussion, either. Maybe regular readers might not find this stuff particularly new or surprising? But the post was even on the frontpage of reddit.com and popurls.com for a few hours (thanks to reddit user “partyjess” for submitting it to reddit, by the way!), which garnered a thousand views or so in just a few hours, and those are largely first-time visitors. But still, no comments. Odd. Any theories?

  4. Jeff Says:

    I’m only a casual travel geek, but yeah, I watched this on TV back when it came on, and it makes me not want to fly a regional again… or at least think more than twice about it! OK, so I will fly regionals when I have to, but still an eye-opening program about the industry.

Leave a Reply