<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your shoes remain a threat to security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:55:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Clear / Verified Identity Pass shuts down &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-28395</link>
		<dc:creator>Clear / Verified Identity Pass shuts down &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-28395</guid>
		<description>[...] - Do airlines’ most frequent flyers deserve shorter security lines? - Your shoes remain a threat to security - Would you pay a fee to reserve a time to pass through airport security? Categorized in: airport [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Do airlines’ most frequent flyers deserve shorter security lines? &#8211; Your shoes remain a threat to security &#8211; Would you pay a fee to reserve a time to pass through airport security? Categorized in: airport [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No ID at security: Fast-track to a government &#8220;list&#8221;? Either way, why are we bothering? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-23026</link>
		<dc:creator>No ID at security: Fast-track to a government &#8220;list&#8221;? Either way, why are we bothering? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-23026</guid>
		<description>[...] - A handy guide for luggage inspectors - TSA wants to know who’s flying 72 hours beforehand - Your shoes remain a threat to security - Would you pay a fee to reserve a time to pass through airport security? - Dangerous shirts see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; A handy guide for luggage inspectors &#8211; TSA wants to know who’s flying 72 hours beforehand &#8211; Your shoes remain a threat to security &#8211; Would you pay a fee to reserve a time to pass through airport security? &#8211; Dangerous shirts see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16770</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16770</guid>
		<description>TierFlyer, and why would that be the case?  It either detects explosives on a person, or it doesn&#039;t.  

And aren&#039;t we at war?  Can we afford mistakes like this?  Surely we could have afforded a test under realistic conditions (but outside the airport), if that&#039;s what it takes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TierFlyer, and why would that be the case?  It either detects explosives on a person, or it doesn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>And aren&#8217;t we at war?  Can we afford mistakes like this?  Surely we could have afforded a test under realistic conditions (but outside the airport), if that&#8217;s what it takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TierFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16769</link>
		<dc:creator>TierFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16769</guid>
		<description>Brian - People keep saying that, but as you can&#039;t possibly prove that (nor the inverse) it&#039;s not a very interesting thing to say.

Mark - It may well have worked fine in testing (see: Vega) but not so well in mass distribution.  Like nationalized health care, things that work in small doses often fail when applied to larger systems.

-TF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; People keep saying that, but as you can&#8217;t possibly prove that (nor the inverse) it&#8217;s not a very interesting thing to say.</p>
<p>Mark &#8211; It may well have worked fine in testing (see: Vega) but not so well in mass distribution.  Like nationalized health care, things that work in small doses often fail when applied to larger systems.</p>
<p>-TF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16758</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16758</guid>
		<description>Sorry commenters, I can&#039;t side with you. While I understand everyone&#039;s desire for safety, the absurd rigmarole we&#039;re put through at security isn&#039;t enhancing our security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry commenters, I can&#8217;t side with you. While I understand everyone&#8217;s desire for safety, the absurd rigmarole we&#8217;re put through at security isn&#8217;t enhancing our security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16747</guid>
		<description>Admitting they&#039;re wrong: good.

Deploying ineffective and insufficiently tested equipment under the guise of enhanced security, especially at premium prices: bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admitting they&#8217;re wrong: good.</p>
<p>Deploying ineffective and insufficiently tested equipment under the guise of enhanced security, especially at premium prices: bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TierFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16735</link>
		<dc:creator>TierFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/10/10/your-shoes-remain-a-threat-to-security/#comment-16735</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think you have the wrong end of that stick - good for them for deciding that a decision they&#039;d already made was *wrong* and then publicly retracting it.

It would have been much easier to just have some good inside groupthink and use the machine anyway.

Airport security is like any security - it is not designed to make you comfy but to work.

-TF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think you have the wrong end of that stick &#8211; good for them for deciding that a decision they&#8217;d already made was *wrong* and then publicly retracting it.</p>
<p>It would have been much easier to just have some good inside groupthink and use the machine anyway.</p>
<p>Airport security is like any security &#8211; it is not designed to make you comfy but to work.</p>
<p>-TF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
