<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: United&#8217;s half-assed policy changes: Not quite a bill of rights, and not quite an upgrade policy fix</title>
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Short hops &#8212; June 12, 2007 &#8212; Airline food, resort fees, no-fly lists, and more &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-15009</link>
		<author>Short hops &#8212; June 12, 2007 &#8212; Airline food, resort fees, no-fly lists, and more &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-15009</guid>
		<description>[...] attendants pan United&#8217;s &#8220;bill of rights&#8221; United Airlines&#8217; pathetic attempt at warding off the passengers&#8217; bill of rights was slammed last week by its own flight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] attendants pan United&#8217;s &#8220;bill of rights&#8221; United Airlines&#8217; pathetic attempt at warding off the passengers&#8217; bill of rights was slammed last week by its own flight [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14926</link>
		<author>Mark Ashley</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14926</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;These cheap moves won't help.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Hear, hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>These cheap moves won&#8217;t help.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hear, hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Global Traveller</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14916</link>
		<author>The Global Traveller</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14916</guid>
		<description>By requiring registration, with a limited period in which to do so, United's change of heart is a token appeasement.

How many Mileage Plus members that are eligible (ie have sufficient status) will not sign up and thus lose out?  An opt in basis to retain an existing benefit is ugly.

Further, anyone who doesn't yet have sufficient status also loses out.  The biggest losers are good future international customers who often can't use the 500-miles (since only valid on domestic flights).

United needs all the help it can get luring valuable customers away from better airlines like Singapore, Qantas and Air New Zealand.  These cheap moves won't help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By requiring registration, with a limited period in which to do so, United&#8217;s change of heart is a token appeasement.</p>
<p>How many Mileage Plus members that are eligible (ie have sufficient status) will not sign up and thus lose out?  An opt in basis to retain an existing benefit is ugly.</p>
<p>Further, anyone who doesn&#8217;t yet have sufficient status also loses out.  The biggest losers are good future international customers who often can&#8217;t use the 500-miles (since only valid on domestic flights).</p>
<p>United needs all the help it can get luring valuable customers away from better airlines like Singapore, Qantas and Air New Zealand.  These cheap moves won&#8217;t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Berkheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14915</link>
		<author>John Berkheimer</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14915</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately blaming the airline for many of these delays isn't going to get us anywhere - they affect airlines across the board because of problems with traffic congestion.  Airlines are loosing TONS of money with airplanes sitting on the ground burning fuel for hours at a time waiting for a flight slot to open... yet they have to push away from the gate because you have inbounds that need to let passengers off.  We won't see much real relief until the FAA and gov't decides to properly fund upgrades.  Too bad we're too busy in Iraq to take care of our own issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately blaming the airline for many of these delays isn&#8217;t going to get us anywhere - they affect airlines across the board because of problems with traffic congestion.  Airlines are loosing TONS of money with airplanes sitting on the ground burning fuel for hours at a time waiting for a flight slot to open&#8230; yet they have to push away from the gate because you have inbounds that need to let passengers off.  We won&#8217;t see much real relief until the FAA and gov&#8217;t decides to properly fund upgrades.  Too bad we&#8217;re too busy in Iraq to take care of our own issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14910</link>
		<author>Mark Ashley</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14910</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bring back the bankruptcy days.  At least I got decent customer service then.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Unfortunately, I agree with you, Rob.  I like bankrupt United better.

But I'm repeating myself ;) :
http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/05/10/delta-and-northwest-leaving-bankruptcy-bad-for-passengers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bring back the bankruptcy days.  At least I got decent customer service then.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, I agree with you, Rob.  I like bankrupt United better.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m repeating myself <img src='http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> :<br />
<a href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/05/10/delta-and-northwest-leaving-bankruptcy-bad-for-passengers/" rel="nofollow" class="liinternal">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/05/10/delta-and-northwest-leaving-bankruptcy-bad-for-passengers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14909</link>
		<author>Mark Ashley</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>Matt, it depends on how high your status is, if you ask me.  

You mentioned Economy Plus.  That's the biggest selling point for low-level elites on UA, I think.  Once you hit mid-level (Premier Executive), you get lounge access on international flights and double miles, and you're higher on the upgrade waitlist, which is noticeable on domestic flights.  Unless you're a top-level (1K) member, your international upgrade options stink on UA.  

UA's lower elites at least have the fallback of Economy Plus, which is especially valuable on long flights.  Unfortunately, that logic is exactly what the executives are banking on.  They're assuming that their Premiers will take all the abuse the airline can muster as long as E+ is still an option.  The PremEx and 1K elites are more likely to defect if the policies (like the recent 500-miler expiration) changes.  But take that away...

If you were Platinum on Continental, I'm sure they treated you well.  Lower-tier elites haven't always raved about the program.  See this post, for example (written during happier days at Mileage Plus, fyi...) which also links to a FlyerTalk thread on status matching, if you're considering defecting.
http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/03/21/debating-the-value-of-elite-status/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, it depends on how high your status is, if you ask me.  </p>
<p>You mentioned Economy Plus.  That&#8217;s the biggest selling point for low-level elites on UA, I think.  Once you hit mid-level (Premier Executive), you get lounge access on international flights and double miles, and you&#8217;re higher on the upgrade waitlist, which is noticeable on domestic flights.  Unless you&#8217;re a top-level (1K) member, your international upgrade options stink on UA.  </p>
<p>UA&#8217;s lower elites at least have the fallback of Economy Plus, which is especially valuable on long flights.  Unfortunately, that logic is exactly what the executives are banking on.  They&#8217;re assuming that their Premiers will take all the abuse the airline can muster as long as E+ is still an option.  The PremEx and 1K elites are more likely to defect if the policies (like the recent 500-miler expiration) changes.  But take that away&#8230;</p>
<p>If you were Platinum on Continental, I&#8217;m sure they treated you well.  Lower-tier elites haven&#8217;t always raved about the program.  See this post, for example (written during happier days at Mileage Plus, fyi&#8230;) which also links to a FlyerTalk thread on status matching, if you&#8217;re considering defecting.<br />
<a href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/03/21/debating-the-value-of-elite-status/" rel="nofollow" class="liinternal">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/03/21/debating-the-value-of-elite-status/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14908</link>
		<author>Rob</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14908</guid>
		<description>Yet another reason to let the Premier Membership expire come Feb. 2008.  I suppose my nearly 50,000 miles and my 39 segments on them is not enough for them.  

I've come to expect this from United though.  Sad but true.  Bring back the bankruptcy days.  At least I got decent customer service then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason to let the Premier Membership expire come Feb. 2008.  I suppose my nearly 50,000 miles and my 39 segments on them is not enough for them.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come to expect this from United though.  Sad but true.  Bring back the bankruptcy days.  At least I got decent customer service then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14904</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/06/01/uniteds-half-assed-policy-changes-not-quite-a-bill-of-rights-and-not-quite-an-upgrade-policy-fix/#comment-14904</guid>
		<description>It's items like this that make me wonder if being Elite on UAL is really worth anything.  For nine years, I was Platinum with CO and then switched companies this past year with a UAL contract.

Though I appreciate some things (737s from CLE, Star Alliance for Intl, E+ when not upgraded) their elite program leaves something to be desired.

I have an opportunity in a couple of weeks to fly Int'l and am thinking of defecting back towards CO (via NW) because being elite on UAL doesn't seem to mean a hill of beans.

Any thoughts?  I'm happy to be proven wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s items like this that make me wonder if being Elite on UAL is really worth anything.  For nine years, I was Platinum with CO and then switched companies this past year with a UAL contract.</p>
<p>Though I appreciate some things (737s from CLE, Star Alliance for Intl, E+ when not upgraded) their elite program leaves something to be desired.</p>
<p>I have an opportunity in a couple of weeks to fly Int&#8217;l and am thinking of defecting back towards CO (via NW) because being elite on UAL doesn&#8217;t seem to mean a hill of beans.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?  I&#8217;m happy to be proven wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.348 seconds -->
