<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Airlines: Separate but lavender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Do we really need women-only lavatories inflight? &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-34092</link>
		<dc:creator>Do we really need women-only lavatories inflight? &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-34092</guid>
		<description>[...] gender for a while. (You may recall my skepticism of the efforts by American Airlines to create a website targeted at women. Granted, they&#8217;ve improved the site and made it less&#8230; lavender.) But this takes it to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gender for a while. (You may recall my skepticism of the efforts by American Airlines to create a website targeted at women. Granted, they&#8217;ve improved the site and made it less&#8230; lavender.) But this takes it to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSS</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-16618</link>
		<dc:creator>MSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-16618</guid>
		<description>There is some b.s. in the air....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some b.s. in the air&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogZinger &#187; American Airlines Stirs Things Up Online With Their New Site Targeting Women</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-15002</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogZinger &#187; American Airlines Stirs Things Up Online With Their New Site Targeting Women</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-15002</guid>
		<description>[...] the site&#8217;s color-scheme. The color has since been changed&#8211;tag lines such as &#8220;Separate but lavender&#8221; were arguably not the sort of attention the airline was hoping would spread across the Internet in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the site&#8217;s color-scheme. The color has since been changed&#8211;tag lines such as &#8220;Separate but lavender&#8221; were arguably not the sort of attention the airline was hoping would spread across the Internet in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infrequent flyer</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-14893</link>
		<dc:creator>infrequent flyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-14893</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that a company marketing to a specific gender will work, particularly an airline.  It&#039;s not cosmetics.  With airlines I think marketing has to be a little more subtle.    Hooters Air couldn&#039;t quite stay aloft, and they basically marketed to intoxicated men with scantilly clad waitresses.  You&#039;d think that would have been a money maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that a company marketing to a specific gender will work, particularly an airline.  It&#8217;s not cosmetics.  With airlines I think marketing has to be a little more subtle.    Hooters Air couldn&#8217;t quite stay aloft, and they basically marketed to intoxicated men with scantilly clad waitresses.  You&#8217;d think that would have been a money maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrades and Downgrades &#8212; April 12, 2007 &#8212; American&#8217;s website, more stranded passengers, wine and spirits, and more &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11827</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrades and Downgrades &#8212; April 12, 2007 &#8212; American&#8217;s website, more stranded passengers, wine and spirits, and more &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11827</guid>
		<description>[...] Lavender Update: The controversial and lame American Airlines website for women got a minor redesign, as Meg at the Consumerist noticed. See [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lavender Update: The controversial and lame American Airlines website for women got a minor redesign, as Meg at the Consumerist noticed. See [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11804</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11804</guid>
		<description>Mark,
   Agree completely. We&#039;ve also posted a critical note about this -- giving both a male and female perspective -- on http://howtotravelamerica.blogspot.com . It&#039;s totally a marketing gimmick, with no real apparent value to women OR men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
   Agree completely. We&#8217;ve also posted a critical note about this &#8212; giving both a male and female perspective &#8212; on <a href="http://howtotravelamerica.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="liexternal">http://howtotravelamerica.blogspot.com</a> . It&#8217;s totally a marketing gimmick, with no real apparent value to women OR men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Perrin</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11802</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you, Benet!

Mark, you ask what women travelers want. I just posted an entry about AA&#039;s Web site myself, with a couple of suggestions for what AA can do if it REALLY cares about women: 
http://www.concierge.com/cntraveler/blogs/perrinpost/2007/04/american_airlin.html#more

Hope you enjoy it,
Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Benet!</p>
<p>Mark, you ask what women travelers want. I just posted an entry about AA&#8217;s Web site myself, with a couple of suggestions for what AA can do if it REALLY cares about women:<br />
<a href="http://www.concierge.com/cntraveler/blogs/perrinpost/2007/04/american_airlin.html#more" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="liexternal">http://www.concierge.com/cntraveler/blogs/perrinpost/2007/04/american_airlin.html#more</a></p>
<p>Hope you enjoy it,<br />
Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11799</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;
My wife, who is too &lt;strike&gt;lazy&lt;/strike&gt; busy to comment here herself, just pointed out to me that the ladies&#039; booking box features an AA plane peeking in.  &quot;Seems awfully phallic,&quot; she said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
My wife, who is too <strike>lazy</strike> busy to comment here herself, just pointed out to me that the ladies&#8217; booking box features an AA plane peeking in.  &#8220;Seems awfully phallic,&#8221; she said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benet Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11798</link>
		<dc:creator>Benet Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11798</guid>
		<description>Good lord - this makes American sound like they&#039;ve just discovered women travelers.  Pam makes a good point -- you can&#039;t just lump us all together because we&#039;re women.  I mean, I am a frequent business traveler, but I&#039;m also a mother who flies with her 16-month-old baby.  That means I have different needs for my flights.

I remember back in the mid-1990s, the second (or third - who can keep up) incarnation of Midway Airlines came up with a similar marketing program.  They dedicated one lav just for women, and put in a larger mirror and flowers.  Forget that - I need more room for my laptop!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord &#8211; this makes American sound like they&#8217;ve just discovered women travelers.  Pam makes a good point &#8212; you can&#8217;t just lump us all together because we&#8217;re women.  I mean, I am a frequent business traveler, but I&#8217;m also a mother who flies with her 16-month-old baby.  That means I have different needs for my flights.</p>
<p>I remember back in the mid-1990s, the second (or third &#8211; who can keep up) incarnation of Midway Airlines came up with a similar marketing program.  They dedicated one lav just for women, and put in a larger mirror and flowers.  Forget that &#8211; I need more room for my laptop!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11793</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/04/10/american-airlines-separate-but-lavender/#comment-11793</guid>
		<description>This is the silliest thing I&#039;ve ever seen. I&#039;m a man, so I guess I don&#039;t get anything personalized, but...for real...what the heck is that site?

A purple search box?  Some generic information?  Lame.  

If you can&#039;t do something right, don&#039;t do it at all.  And yes, I&#039;m an American Airlines frequent flier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the silliest thing I&#8217;ve ever seen. I&#8217;m a man, so I guess I don&#8217;t get anything personalized, but&#8230;for real&#8230;what the heck is that site?</p>
<p>A purple search box?  Some generic information?  Lame.  </p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t do something right, don&#8217;t do it at all.  And yes, I&#8217;m an American Airlines frequent flier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

