On auto-pilot: Planes and this blog
First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!

Boeing is testing a new form of autopilot that might make hijackings even harder by putting the plane’s controls in the hands of people on the ground.
[The system] will be activated by the pilot flicking a simple switch or by pressure sensors fitted to the cockpit door that will respond to any excessive force as terrorists try to break into the flight deck. Once triggered, no one on board will be able to deactivate the system. Currently, all autopilots are manually switched on and off at the discretion of pilots. The so-called ‘uninterruptible autopilot system’ - patented secretly by Boeing in the US last week - will connect ground controllers and security services with the aircraft using radio waves and global satellite positioning systems. After it has been activated, the aircraft will be capable of remote digital control from the ground, enabling operators to fly it like a sophisticated model plane, manoeuvring it vertically and laterally. A threatened airliner could be flown to a secure military base or a commercial airport, where it would touch down using existing landing aids known as ‘autoland function’.
Of course, you hope that the system is configured so that it doesn’t kick in every time the beverage cart bumps into the cockpit door.
And speaking of autopilot, I’m on vacation for a few days, and the odds are slim that I’ll have regular, easy internet access. So I’ve queued up a few posts for the coming days and handed the keys to the kingdom to my good friend Tyler Colman, a.k.a. Dr. Vino. We might get some guest posts out of him, but no promises, and no pressure!


Subscribe to Posts by Email
March 15th, 2007 at 6:39 am |
The wisdom of the approach depends, of course, on the assumption that someone on the ground would not have the opportunity to maliciously take control of an aircraft in the air.
March 15th, 2007 at 8:43 am |
Harder to hijack? At least this means they don’t have to scramble jets to shoot down the plane. Hard to forget that that’s the alternative today.
But it seems it might make it more likely that the threat to blow up the plane instead of landing in a sunny clime would be the more likely outcome.
March 20th, 2007 at 9:26 am |
Actually this makes it even worse in some cases. Imagine if some hacker took control over the ground side digital controls and “decided” to override the pilot.
It’s like the way the terrorists took over an airport in Die Hard 2 except now instead of taking control over the Air Tower and the landing systems, they can take direct control over the planes.
Might not be such a good idea.
April 9th, 2007 at 8:01 am |
Sound like a marveous idea provided that the automatic override can only be engaged with a signal that is verified.