<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pack light: Spirit Airlines charging fees for 2nd checked bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:55:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Downgrades: Spirit Airlines to charge for ALL luggage, coffee, and soda</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Downgrades: Spirit Airlines to charge for ALL luggage, coffee, and soda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>[...] The ink had hardly dried on their announcement last month that they would be charging $10 for a second checked bag. Now, Spirit Airlines has rolled out a range of changes, converting the airline into a European-style discount carrier, similar to Ryanair or Easyjet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The ink had hardly dried on their announcement last month that they would be charging $10 for a second checked bag. Now, Spirit Airlines has rolled out a range of changes, converting the airline into a European-style discount carrier, similar to Ryanair or Easyjet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why are some countries exempt from British Airways&#8217; draconian baggage rules?</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why are some countries exempt from British Airways&#8217; draconian baggage rules?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>[...] After all, Spirit Airlines just instituted a rule that a second suitcase would cost you $10 extra. So I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything on the books here in the U.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After all, Spirit Airlines just instituted a rule that a second suitcase would cost you $10 extra. So I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything on the books here in the U.S. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $235 to check a second bag on British Airways</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $235 to check a second bag on British Airways</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>[...] Just three days ago, we learned that Spirit Airlines would start charging $10 each way if a passenger wanted to check a second bag. But that&#8217;s peanuts. British Airways will be charging Â£120 &#8212; the equivalent of $235 &#8212; for an extra bag. Each way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just three days ago, we learned that Spirit Airlines would start charging $10 each way if a passenger wanted to check a second bag. But that&#8217;s peanuts. British Airways will be charging Â£120 &#8212; the equivalent of $235 &#8212; for an extra bag. Each way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2007/02/05/pack-light-spirit-airlines-charging-fees-for-2nd-checked-bag/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>Since there is an actual cost associated with transporting luggage (handling of the bags, fuel, &quot;insurance&quot;), I wouldn&#039;t have a problem with them charging a fee for every bag beyond the carry-on (which, of course, would have to be strictly size-limited).  Since I mostly travel with just light carry-on, why should a portion of my ticket price cover the overall cost of transporting luggage?  Just because it historically was the way to do business doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the right wa to do business.  We call&#039;em legacy carriers and dinosaurs for a reason, aren&#039;t we?

The nickel and diming I would NOT like is the stuff that doesn&#039;t cost the airlines anything, like choosing a seat at reservation time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there is an actual cost associated with transporting luggage (handling of the bags, fuel, &#8220;insurance&#8221;), I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with them charging a fee for every bag beyond the carry-on (which, of course, would have to be strictly size-limited).  Since I mostly travel with just light carry-on, why should a portion of my ticket price cover the overall cost of transporting luggage?  Just because it historically was the way to do business doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the right wa to do business.  We call&#8217;em legacy carriers and dinosaurs for a reason, aren&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>The nickel and diming I would NOT like is the stuff that doesn&#8217;t cost the airlines anything, like choosing a seat at reservation time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
