<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making sense of the new TSA liquids policy</title>
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: momo_the_monster</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-18121</link>
		<author>momo_the_monster</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-18121</guid>
		<description>
to 'anonymous' above:

Your argument might 'hold some water', so to speak, except that there was no 'bombing attempt' in the UK. There was a terrorist cell who came up with the idea of a liquid bomb, but had no idea how to do it.

Subsequent tests have indicated that there is no reliable way to make this so-called 'liquid bomb'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to &#8216;anonymous&#8217; above:</p>
<p>Your argument might &#8216;hold some water&#8217;, so to speak, except that there was no &#8216;bombing attempt&#8217; in the UK. There was a terrorist cell who came up with the idea of a liquid bomb, but had no idea how to do it.</p>
<p>Subsequent tests have indicated that there is no reliable way to make this so-called &#8216;liquid bomb&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquids liberated, but free speech still threatened in airports &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-11849</link>
		<author>Liquids liberated, but free speech still threatened in airports &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-11849</guid>
		<description>[...] describes his experience in passing through security yesterday. The TSA&#8217;s new regulations require you to include small bottles of liquids in a one-quart plastic zipper bag, so MKEbound did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] describes his experience in passing through security yesterday. The TSA&#8217;s new regulations require you to include small bottles of liquids in a one-quart plastic zipper bag, so MKEbound did [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-11842</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-11842</guid>
		<description>It all boilds down to the fact that there isn't a way to tell if something is water or if it is a clear explosive (gasoline).

It also boils down to explosives. Normally liquids are ignored and unquestioned. But after the bombing attempt in the UK, the TSA decided to ban liquids in large amounts. Even if the Office looks inside the bag and removes the water, the bag has gone under more scrutinty than before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all boilds down to the fact that there isn&#8217;t a way to tell if something is water or if it is a clear explosive (gasoline).</p>
<p>It also boils down to explosives. Normally liquids are ignored and unquestioned. But after the bombing attempt in the UK, the TSA decided to ban liquids in large amounts. Even if the Office looks inside the bag and removes the water, the bag has gone under more scrutinty than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wheatcroft</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-213</link>
		<author>Tim Wheatcroft</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/09/26/making-sense-of-the-new-tsa-liquids-policy/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Yes - I was flying from Singapore to SFO through Hong Kong on United this weekend. I was security checked at SIN, then once more as we got off the plane in HKG before going to the transit lounge. I bought three small packs of Tiger Balm at duty free, and then 10 minutes later had them taken off me at the second HKG security check, in the departure lounge. There was a final security check at the end of the jetway. 

Sheer madness. Luckily I only wasted about $10, but what if I'd decided to splash out on a bottle of whiskey at either SIN or HKG? I understand the issues, but how I could have blown a plane up with an ounce of sealed Tiger Balm, bought after going through two security checkpoints is just insanity. Thanks also to HKG duty free for letting me buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - I was flying from Singapore to SFO through Hong Kong on United this weekend. I was security checked at SIN, then once more as we got off the plane in HKG before going to the transit lounge. I bought three small packs of Tiger Balm at duty free, and then 10 minutes later had them taken off me at the second HKG security check, in the departure lounge. There was a final security check at the end of the jetway. </p>
<p>Sheer madness. Luckily I only wasted about $10, but what if I&#8217;d decided to splash out on a bottle of whiskey at either SIN or HKG? I understand the issues, but how I could have blown a plane up with an ounce of sealed Tiger Balm, bought after going through two security checkpoints is just insanity. Thanks also to HKG duty free for letting me buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
