The flying petting zoo vs. the War on Allergens
First time here? Check out the site's "greatest hits" or read a random post from the archives. Feel free to ask a question, and consider subscribing to the latest posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!

When Air Canada isn’t kicking unruly 6-year old kids off of planes, they’re sending your cranky cat to the cargo hold.
Beginning September 18, no pets will be allowed inside the passenger cabin on Air Canada flights. Guide dogs will be an exception.
While Air Canada is saying “no” (and “non,” presumably) to your furry friends, other airlines are stepping up with more pet-friendly policies. Roger Collis offers up a short (if Eurocentric) list in the International Herald Tribune. I personally favor Virgin Atlantic’s apparent policy of providing ferrets (and presumably other animals) with a “cool limited edition flying jacket and collar tag.” Swank.
Better yet, upstart CompanionAir plans to be the first airline catering exclusively to pets and their owners. Another niche airline? Why the hell not. It’s about as likely to take off as Air Gumbo at this point.
But until CompanionAir is flying, owners planning to take their pets to the skies should consult with the list of policies and tips offered at PetsWelcome.com. Though hardly globally authoritative, the site provides a good overview of the largest airlines’ pet policies.
As a person who’s allergic to most furry creatures, I actually see a no-pets policy as a perk, though I realize that pet owners are understandably worried about putting their animals in another person’s hands. Checking your pet as cargo will always involve some risk. Maybe owners should just hope for the best and then treat their pets to a luxurious pet spa at the destination…
(image)
tags: travel | pets | ferrets with cool limited edition flying jackets | CompanionAir |


Subscribe to Posts by Email
September 14th, 2006 at 6:06 pm |
I’ve travelled on Northwest with my fat cat (too large for cabin travel) and I have nothing but props for the NWA folks who looked after him. True to their word, he was last on and first off the cargo on at least one flight that I can attest to (I happened to have a window seat that allowed full view of the baggage handling). We also had a hiccup - on the outbound trip it turns out the flight was delayed. When I asked the gate attendant about the welfare of my baby, she called downstairs and asked. Turns out the animal attendant had taken apart his cage to let him out for a while when she learned of the delay and now couldn’t get his cage back together. So I got to take a trip to the bowels of the Minneapolis airport and viewed the animal holding site firsthand. It was clean and bright, with large cages. The attendant seemed attentive and kind, allowing me to hold and pet my cat for quite a while (which made us both feel better). All in all, the trip was as smooth as could be because of the professional workers at NWA.
May 19th, 2007 at 7:15 pm |
[…] Related: - The flying petting zoo vs. the war on allergens […]