<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So how accurate is Farecast?</title>
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fare guarantee? Farecast lets you insure its fare predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/#comment-7096</link>
		<author>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fare guarantee? Farecast lets you insure its fare predictions</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>[...] Ironically, this comes on the heels of the Seattle Times&#8217; review of Farecast today. The newspaper found that the service was accurate in predicting the direction of fares in 61% of the searches queried. That&#8217;s below the firm&#8217;s target of 75%, but above my earlier (limited) assessment of around 50% accuracy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ironically, this comes on the heels of the Seattle Times&#8217; review of Farecast today. The newspaper found that the service was accurate in predicting the direction of fares in 61% of the searches queried. That&#8217;s below the firm&#8217;s target of 75%, but above my earlier (limited) assessment of around 50% accuracy. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
