<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So how accurate is Farecast?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:55:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Farecast expands price predictions to over 50 cities &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/#comment-30232</link>
		<dc:creator>Farecast expands price predictions to over 50 cities &#124; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upgradetravelbetter.com/?p=159#comment-30232</guid>
		<description>[...] - Farecast beta goes public, just in time for a reader review - So how accurate is Farecast? - The traveler&#8217;s crystal ball - Market timing: More advice on when to buy cheap plane tickets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Farecast beta goes public, just in time for a reader review &#8211; So how accurate is Farecast? &#8211; The traveler&#8217;s crystal ball &#8211; Market timing: More advice on when to buy cheap plane tickets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farecast beta goes public, just in time for a reader review &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/#comment-25219</link>
		<dc:creator>Farecast beta goes public, just in time for a reader review &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upgradetravelbetter.com/?p=159#comment-25219</guid>
		<description>[...] posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!Airfare prediction site Farecast, fresh from weeks of generally good PR, is now live for public beta testing. No special logins required any longer. However, the site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts via RSS or e-mail. Thanks for visiting!Airfare prediction site Farecast, fresh from weeks of generally good PR, is now live for public beta testing. No special logins required any longer. However, the site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fare guarantee? Farecast lets you insure its fare predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/06/13/so-how-accurate-is-farecast/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fare guarantee? Farecast lets you insure its fare predictions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upgradetravelbetter.com/?p=159#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>[...] Ironically, this comes on the heels of the Seattle Times&#8217; review of Farecast today. The newspaper found that the service was accurate in predicting the direction of fares in 61% of the searches queried. That&#8217;s below the firm&#8217;s target of 75%, but above my earlier (limited) assessment of around 50% accuracy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ironically, this comes on the heels of the Seattle Times&#8217; review of Farecast today. The newspaper found that the service was accurate in predicting the direction of fares in 61% of the searches queried. That&#8217;s below the firm&#8217;s target of 75%, but above my earlier (limited) assessment of around 50% accuracy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
