<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MaxJet&#8217;s fatal flaw?</title>
	<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/</link>
	<description>Living the first class life -- at coach prices</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: From the Mind of J</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-19288</link>
		<author>From the Mind of J</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-19288</guid>
		<description>Guess Mark was right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess Mark was right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plenty of room to stretch out in all-business-class airlines across Atlantic &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18511</link>
		<author>Plenty of room to stretch out in all-business-class airlines across Atlantic &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18511</guid>
		<description>[...] lies: high-rolling vacationers, and not business travelers at all. While the MaxJet model has its flaws, its sale fares are still a great deal for high quality inflight service. Perhaps they&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] lies: high-rolling vacationers, and not business travelers at all. While the MaxJet model has its flaws, its sale fares are still a great deal for high quality inflight service. Perhaps they&#8217;ll [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18499</link>
		<author>William Henderson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18499</guid>
		<description>Re Los Angeles

We travelled out on 29 November 2007 on a direct flight from Stansted to Los Angeles.

There were only 28 passengers. The London lounge is very comfortable with excellent food. Yes the plane was old but it has been refurbished with about 105 big blue seats. The aircraft are maintained at Stansted and I think they are in excellent condition.

I was not too impressed with the food. I had thai curry which was tasteless and I had to send it back as there was a big 'head hair' in my dinner. They apologised and I had a beef rib as a relacement but it was very fatty. You get a big plate of mixed lettuce as a starter and again that is very poor.

You can have as much wine or champagne as you want and the crew are attentive.

I just had the feeling that the writing was on the wall as another passenger told me that they had cancelled Stansted to LA on 30 November 2007 and brought passengers forward a day. One of the days we were in LA the flight to Stansted stopped at Las Vegas to pick up Stansted passengers so presumably that flight was cancelled. I was a little worried about getting back and half expected them to cancel but in the end it was ok.

Our return flight on 6 December 2007 had less than 50 passengers.

Trouble is everyone you speak to in LA has never heard of Maxjet. They want to know about it so I give them the email address.

I have previously travelled to New York with them in August and it was fine.

I do hope they survive as the check in and fast track is fantastic and is many times better than Heathrow and no M25 to face.

What a pleasure to fly on this service from Stansted to LA.

But clearly you cannot survive on that run if you combine 2 flights and only have 28
passengers.

I think they should have a sale of the century and offer £500 returns for 3 months to inspire confidence. As everyone pays by card then it will be the card provider who suffers if they collapse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Los Angeles</p>
<p>We travelled out on 29 November 2007 on a direct flight from Stansted to Los Angeles.</p>
<p>There were only 28 passengers. The London lounge is very comfortable with excellent food. Yes the plane was old but it has been refurbished with about 105 big blue seats. The aircraft are maintained at Stansted and I think they are in excellent condition.</p>
<p>I was not too impressed with the food. I had thai curry which was tasteless and I had to send it back as there was a big &#8216;head hair&#8217; in my dinner. They apologised and I had a beef rib as a relacement but it was very fatty. You get a big plate of mixed lettuce as a starter and again that is very poor.</p>
<p>You can have as much wine or champagne as you want and the crew are attentive.</p>
<p>I just had the feeling that the writing was on the wall as another passenger told me that they had cancelled Stansted to LA on 30 November 2007 and brought passengers forward a day. One of the days we were in LA the flight to Stansted stopped at Las Vegas to pick up Stansted passengers so presumably that flight was cancelled. I was a little worried about getting back and half expected them to cancel but in the end it was ok.</p>
<p>Our return flight on 6 December 2007 had less than 50 passengers.</p>
<p>Trouble is everyone you speak to in LA has never heard of Maxjet. They want to know about it so I give them the email address.</p>
<p>I have previously travelled to New York with them in August and it was fine.</p>
<p>I do hope they survive as the check in and fast track is fantastic and is many times better than Heathrow and no M25 to face.</p>
<p>What a pleasure to fly on this service from Stansted to LA.</p>
<p>But clearly you cannot survive on that run if you combine 2 flights and only have 28<br />
passengers.</p>
<p>I think they should have a sale of the century and offer £500 returns for 3 months to inspire confidence. As everyone pays by card then it will be the card provider who suffers if they collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the end near for Maxjet? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18474</link>
		<author>Is the end near for Maxjet? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-18474</guid>
		<description>[...] - Maxjet&#8217;s fatal flaw? - All-business class to China? - Silverjet IPO enables third London-New York all-business-class [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - Maxjet&#8217;s fatal flaw? - All-business class to China? - Silverjet IPO enables third London-New York all-business-class [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-14587</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-14587</guid>
		<description>Like someone else said, the crew will charge your laptop if you ask and the service is very friendly, the London lounge lovely with excellent food (one of the best) and it's half the price of EoS. It is great for someone like me who likes luxuty but can't justify full price business airlines. I don't need to "lie flat" for a 6/7 hour flight. The air cabin crew are great; the ground crew are great and it was a pleasure flying Maxjet, which I did several times.

On the other hand, the CEO claims that he welcomes comments and yet totally ignored my carefully prepared and thoughtfully sent letter, so I stopped using Maxjet in a sulk :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like someone else said, the crew will charge your laptop if you ask and the service is very friendly, the London lounge lovely with excellent food (one of the best) and it&#8217;s half the price of EoS. It is great for someone like me who likes luxuty but can&#8217;t justify full price business airlines. I don&#8217;t need to &#8220;lie flat&#8221; for a 6/7 hour flight. The air cabin crew are great; the ground crew are great and it was a pleasure flying Maxjet, which I did several times.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the CEO claims that he welcomes comments and yet totally ignored my carefully prepared and thoughtfully sent letter, so I stopped using Maxjet in a sulk <img src='http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-8236</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-8236</guid>
		<description>Actually none of you are that important. Get over yourselves. Boo Hoo no laptop for 6.5 hours. Did you die ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually none of you are that important. Get over yourselves. Boo Hoo no laptop for 6.5 hours. Did you die ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All-biz airlines filling planes&#8230; and knife-wielding passengers&#8217; stomachs</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-6392</link>
		<author>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All-biz airlines filling planes&#8230; and knife-wielding passengers&#8217; stomachs</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 18:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-6392</guid>
		<description>[...] I still stand by my earlier comments that Maxjet, while providing a great value for a reasonably posh flight, is still not a serious business airline. It&#8217;s luxury class for tourists &#8212; and that&#8217;s terrific! Nothing wrong with that, but it ain&#8217;t business. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I still stand by my earlier comments that Maxjet, while providing a great value for a reasonably posh flight, is still not a serious business airline. It&#8217;s luxury class for tourists &#8212; and that&#8217;s terrific! Nothing wrong with that, but it ain&#8217;t business. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business class New York to London for $750 including all taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-5402</link>
		<author>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business class New York to London for $750 including all taxes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>[...] Flying from New York to London? MaxJet is selling their all-business class flights for less than competitors&#8217; coach fares: $750 *including* all taxes. As I&#8217;ve posted before, it&#8217;s not a state of the art business class experience, it&#8217;s flying to Stansted instead of Heathrow or Gatwick, and you&#8217;re not earning miles toward status or those tickets to Tahiti. But it&#8217;s still a really good deal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Flying from New York to London? MaxJet is selling their all-business class flights for less than competitors&#8217; coach fares: $750 *including* all taxes. As I&#8217;ve posted before, it&#8217;s not a state of the art business class experience, it&#8217;s flying to Stansted instead of Heathrow or Gatwick, and you&#8217;re not earning miles toward status or those tickets to Tahiti. But it&#8217;s still a really good deal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reader mail: Why are there no Y-UP fares to Europe or Asia?</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-644</link>
		<author>Upgrade: Travel Better &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reader mail: Why are there no Y-UP fares to Europe or Asia?</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>[...] For international premium class travel, be sure to also consider the startup airlines like Maxjet, Silverjet, Eos, MiMa, and L&#8217;Avion. These offer all-business class flights to London, Milan, or Paris. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For international premium class travel, be sure to also consider the startup airlines like Maxjet, Silverjet, Eos, MiMa, and L&#8217;Avion. These offer all-business class flights to London, Milan, or Paris. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-14</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>There are power ports on board each aircraft but not at each seat. The cabin crew has charged my laptop for me on board. Compare to British Airways which has an outlet at each seat but requires a Empower adapter to use (which they are happy to sell you on board). 

As for the age of airplanes every US airline must meet the same safety standards which are stringent for transatlantic flights. The 767 is very common for transatlantic flying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are power ports on board each aircraft but not at each seat. The cabin crew has charged my laptop for me on board. Compare to British Airways which has an outlet at each seat but requires a Empower adapter to use (which they are happy to sell you on board). </p>
<p>As for the age of airplanes every US airline must meet the same safety standards which are stringent for transatlantic flights. The 767 is very common for transatlantic flying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-13</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I don't think the age of the planes is such a big deal.  20 years is perfectly fine for a plane.  The interior is redone so it looks new, and the mechanical stuff is maintained.  Planes have a lot of life in them -- just look at Northwest and their DC-9s!

The bigger deal is that Maxjet is really aimed at tourists, not business.  For the service you get, it still may be a good deal, if you need to get to London.

I like the first comment by the Maxjet employee (probably a flight attendant?).  "unwaivering service"?  Not too transparent! haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the age of the planes is such a big deal.  20 years is perfectly fine for a plane.  The interior is redone so it looks new, and the mechanical stuff is maintained.  Planes have a lot of life in them &#8212; just look at Northwest and their DC-9s!</p>
<p>The bigger deal is that Maxjet is really aimed at tourists, not business.  For the service you get, it still may be a good deal, if you need to get to London.</p>
<p>I like the first comment by the Maxjet employee (probably a flight attendant?).  &#8220;unwaivering service&#8221;?  Not too transparent! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-12</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.upgradetravelbetter.com/2006/02/24/maxjets-fatal-flaw/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Maxjet fares are now published at @$1400. Remarkably EOS is offering the same deal. Yet the experience on EOS is markedly different and more upscale than Maxjet. Better food, seats and service.

Maxjet aircraft are twenty year-old planes. I would be very careful here. Saving a few dollars is no substitute for safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxjet fares are now published at @$1400. Remarkably EOS is offering the same deal. Yet the experience on EOS is markedly different and more upscale than Maxjet. Better food, seats and service.</p>
<p>Maxjet aircraft are twenty year-old planes. I would be very careful here. Saving a few dollars is no substitute for safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.354 seconds -->
